|
|||||||||
| :: Issues > Election Coverage | |||||||||
|
Referendum Day
Al-Jazeera is reporting "very low" turnout in the referendum voting so far, especially in Cairo where voting would usually be expected to be high (Kefaya is also reporting weak turnout across the country - though everyone expects a blatantly forged result to be announced). It’s worth noting that on a
|
|||||||||
| Tuesday, March 27,2007 00:00 | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Al-Jazeera is reporting "very low" turnout in the referendum voting so far, especially in Cairo where voting would usually be expected to be high (Kefaya is also reporting weak turnout across the country - though everyone expects a blatantly forged result to be announced). It’s worth noting that on a pretty busy news day, with the Arab Foreign Ministers meeting to talk about the Israeli-Palestinian initiative and plenty of other things, al-Jazeera is leading its news with the Egyptian referendum.
A very tired looking Hussein Abd al-Ghani had NDP official Ali Shams al-Din in his studio, where they debated the implications of a 30% turnout; Shams al-Din tried to both contest the low turnout claim and to lower the bar for what would count as high turnout. Expect such arguments to continue. (Al-Arabiya, which I’ve criticized for not covering the Egyptian events with much enthusiasm, is reporting on it today; I just saw it interviewing a Muslim Brotherhood Member of Parliament who denounced the referendum.) Most Arab outlets are reporting that Condoleeza Rice softened her criticisms of the referendum after meeting with Mubarak. How humiliating, how predictable. Abou el-Gheit is spooning out the terrorism angle - we must do this to protect ourselves, just as you did with your Patriot Act - and Rice (and at least some of the media) seems to be eating it up whatever the flavor. Yes, how could Egypt possibly fight its great terror menace while judges are supervising elections? UPDATE: Elevated from comments, report from the ground by our friend Josh Stacher:
Good stuff from an astute analyst of Egyptian politics. Thanks, Josh. UPDATE 1:00: With the polls now closed, Al-Jazeera’s Hussein Abd al-Ghani has assembled another, very impressive, panel to talk about the referendum - if yesterday’s panel had strong NDP representation, this one is tilted more towards critical and independent voices (Abdullah Senawi, Salama Ahmed Salama, Abd al-Monim Said). Al-Jazeera has really done an excellent job with this, turning itself into an Egyptian domestic outlet for large stretches of the referendum and featuring a wide range of voices. But it’s not the only media outlet that matters, of course. The liberal columnist Magdi Mohanna, who hosts one of the most influential Egyptian talk shows, had Kefaya’s coordinator Abd al-Wahab el-Messiri on yesterday. At least those voices are being heard, despite the official Egyptian media’s best efforts. 4:00 .... Everybody is reporting "very low" or "very weak" turnout... right now al-Jazeera reports turnout of 5-7%. According to Al-Arabiya, the Egyptian Organization for Human Rights claims that turnout was about 2-3%, while the NDP is claiming 24-27%. Al-Jazeera just now interviewed various "civil society monitors" and voting station workers saying that nobody came to vote for hours; Hussein Abd al-Ghani presented estimates of turnout ranging from a semi-official 20% to an independent estimate of under 5%. Continuing his outstanding presentation of a wide range of Egyptian views over the last couple of days, Abd al-Ghani currently has in the studio an NDP deputy and the head of the opposition Karama party Hamdin Sabahi, and just took a phone call from a prominent member of the Judges association (which did not oversee the referendum). No word on results (which according to al-Jazeera are due within hours), but reports of fabrications and cheating are already circulating freely. Final update: the Egyptian government now plans to announce the results tomorrow. It is still claiming the 24-27% turnout I mentioned above, while independent observers are still estimating much lower figures; the claim of 55-60% in some of the more remote districts seems fishy - since those are the ones most likely to be free of pesky independent observers. Al-Jazeera reports observers being driven away from the polling stations by security forces, as well as rumours of ballot boxes being switched... you know, the usual forgery stuff. Here’s a question which I may try to explore more fully tomorrow: what kind of Constitution can be changed by a party line Parliamentary vote followed by a referendum with even a 25% turnout (as per the government’s exaggerated claim), much less the more credible 5-10% turnout? Does something changed so easily at the whim of the ruling party even deserve the name "Constitution", at least as conventionally understood by political scientists? Other Topics: Analysis: Cairo spring revisited Related Topics: Referendum Day |
|||||||||
|
Posted in Election Coverage |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| Related Articles | |||||||||
|
|