National Powers Reject Constitutional Amendments

Wednesday, January 10,2007 00:00

By Ikhwanweb

National Powers Reject Constitutional Amendments, Demand National Change Coalition
Prominent political and human rights activists expressed their outright rejection to National Democratic Party’s (NDP) monopolizing constitutional amendments, and its desperate attempts to do the constitutional amendments excluding other national powers in an attempt to marginalize the role of the opposition and civil society organizations in participating in the ongoing dialogue over approving the new constitutional amendments .

They confirmed- during a round table held by the freedoms committee in the Bar Association today on Monday Jan. 8, 2007, at the beginning of launching a campaign entitled "A Constitution in the Arms of the Homeland", their outright rejection to these attempts; also, they confirmed that putting pre-conditions for the amendments or banning making any amendment on some articles in the constitution means giving a blow to the demands and making the amendments meaningless.

They suggested that only dialogue and agreement are the only means for approving the amendments; they also demanded the political leadership to allow the expected amendments be consistent with the laws adopted in civilized countries, including a democratic method in the rule and administration in order to meet the aspirations of people who love freedom and hate injustice and corruption .

At the beginning, Dr. Atef Al Banna, a constitutional law professor at Cairo University , confirmed that there can’t be a real constitutional reform without having a parliamentary system in which the president is a symbol of the country, while the actual power is held by the government.

He noted that the issue of introducing constitution amendment, and even drafting a new constitution, has been delayed so much; this is because there are many constitutional texts that need amendments; however, when the issue of amending the constitution was raised, they restricted it to amending only one article, and even this amendment was bad; consequently, what is required is holding many amendments, topped by article 76 which needs to be amended again because its latest amendment aimed mostly at depriving independents from nominating and running for the presidential elections.

Al Banna demanded introducing amendment to other articles, particularly those related to the system of rule, the executive authority including both the president and the Cabinet and the texts related to the legislative authority; otherwise, the Prime Minister will remain an affiliate to the president; he must be given his independent power.

Al Banna attacked the regime’s attempt to rule the countries with a police fist, through replacing the temporary state of emergency with a permanent anti-terrorism law.

For his part, counselor Mahmoud Al Khodairi, the deputy chairman of Alexandria’s Judges’ Club and deputy chief justice of the Court of Cassation, denounced the regime’s attempts of canceling the judicial supervision over the elections, through amending article 88 after the National Democratic Party was defeated in the last parliamentary elections and its conviction that it has no place in the political life under honorable and fair elections; this made the regime stop short of holding the elections in 6 constituencies until now; chief justice Al Khodairi demanded that the regime can seek help from international monitors if it fears the Egyptian honorable judges.

The chairman of Alexandria’s Judges’ Club denounced also the president’s insistence on appointing a Vice-President as prescribed by the constitution and laws, although the conspiracy theory believed by some, says that this is for the sake of Tawreeth (hereditary transfer of rule to Mubarak Jr.) and to open the door for the sole successor to assume power smoothly without any competition from a Vice-President who may consider himself worthier to assume the post.

For this reason, the President suggested amending the first item of articles 82 and 84 and the second item of article 85, to allow the Prime Minister to replace the president when there is a temporary or permanent reason that prevented the latter from assuming his post or if the latter is sued before justice, in only some of his powers excluding authorities which may be effective in the political life like dissolving the government or dissolving the People’s Assembly.

As for Dr. Gamal Zahran, a professor of political sciences and MP, he demanded the president to necessarily withdraw these amendments which were very hastily and quickly prepared, increasing suspicions around the regime plans and those who tailored them that there are plans for ratifying the scenario of Tawreeth.
He stressed that the amendments must be shown to people for two or three years during which a real national dialogue should be held among political powers which are the ones having this right in the country; he warned that the NDP’s attempts of monopolizing the political process will harm all peoples, not only the Muslim Brotherhood group which the regime wants to exclude from the political life with its amending Article 5 of the constitution.

In his speech, Dr. Ahmed Abu Baraka- a member in the MB parliamentary- attracted the attention to the fact that the proposed amendments are outrightly rejected in principle, because they don’t meet the aspirations of the Egyptian people including all sections, and that they are considered an obstacle in front of the political movement, restrict the public life and deprives the political powers of exercising their political activities, and sending the Egyptian society to the past ages of lawlessness, as it lacks legitimacy due to excluding all political and national powers from participating in drafting a constitution for the country.

Hussein Abdul Razek, the Secretary-General of al Tajammu’ Party, agreed with him and pointed out that the proposed amendments did not affect the core of the current constitution; consequently, they can’t be approved or recognized; this is because we must move from a totalitarian authoritarian society ruled by one party to a democratic society which is based on a peaceful transfer of power.

Mohamed Al Sayyed Idris, a political expert in Al-Ahram center for political studies, pointed out that the ruling regime is exercising a political monopoly of power; the political expert warned the political powers and parliamentarians of attempting to agree in principle with the regime on the proposed constitutional amendments, because this will be a bait from which the regime can achieve it aspirations from these amendments; don’t forget that the National Party refused to form a coalition government, and included independent MPs to be able to monopolize power without intervention form any other power.

He demanded the national powers to exercise more pressures and form a real national coalition to call for a real change to protect the coming generations, blaming the opposition parties for the responsibility of what is happening because they chose to be just a decor in the political life.

Related Topics:

Authoritarian mechanics
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
insights into the world / Bush’s high goals reach low point
The Daily Yomiuri - Osaka,Japan
The US and Egypt: Giving up on the ’liberty doctrine’
International Herald Tribune - France
The Future of the Muslim Brotherhood
Amr Al-Chobaki, Al-Ahram Centre for Political and Strategic Studies - Cairo, Egypt
The West Abandons the Push For Democracy In The Arab World
Ikhwanweb, London-UK
Presidents in perpetuity
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
’The battle is not over’
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
Back to square one
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
Not yet, thanks
Economist (subscription) - UK
This season’s footwear
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
Parliament Comes Down on Judiciary
Inter Press Service (subscription) - Rome,Italy
EGYPT: New law does little to liberalise judicial system, say Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK
Egyptian Editor Gets Year in Jail for Insult
Voice of America - USA
Egypt justice law ’disappointing’
BBC News - UK
Jailed activists released in Egypt
Socialistworker.co.uk - London,UK
Egypt’s judges have struck a major blow for real democracy
Daily Star - Lebanon - Beirut,Lebanon
EGYPT: Journalists’ sentencing draws angry reactions
Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK
egypt: Islamists detained in Alexandria
Monday Morning - Beirut,Lebanon
Who has an interest in destabilizing Egypt and weakening its role?
Monday Morning - Beirut,Lebanon
Rights Monitor Makes Statement on Cruelty
Los Angeles Times - CA,USA
Debate reignites cartoon row
Gulf News - Dubai,United Arab Emirates
Foreign Exchange with Fareed Zakaria | Where America Meets the World
Newsweek - USA
The Ikhwan complex
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
Antinomies of power
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
Egyptâ€™s new video guerrillas add a twist to social activism
Daily News & Analysis - Mumbai,India
OPT: International Media Seminar discusses impact of media on ...
ReliefWeb (press release) - Geneva,Switzerland
Ferry Report Blames Owners, Corruption
Egypt Today - Cairo,Egypt
US ambassador insists relations on track
Al-Ahram Weekly - Cairo,Egypt
Unlikely Reformers: Egyptian Judges Challenge the Regime
JURIST - USA
MIDDLE EAST: Weekly human-rights roundup
Reuters AlertNet - London,England,UK
Ikhwan Complex:
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
MB Today [About MB]
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
Online Library
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
shifting political currents along the nile
Centre Daily Times - Centre County,PA,USA
Bracing for the final battle
Toronto Star - Ontario, Canada
Egyptian Islamist detained after acquittal
Independent Online - Cape Town,South Africa
Amr Hamzawy Archive
Ikhwanweb -London, UK
Quantifying Arab Democracy
Middle East Forum - Philadelphia,PA,USA
egypt: Mubarak: Unprecedented reforms in 2007
Monday Morning - Beirut,Lebanon
Wael Abbas Pic.
Misr Digital
Cairo Freeze!
Tarek Shahin
The end of Cowboy Diplomacy
WorldNetDaily - Grants Pass,OR,USA